Evaluation Criteria
Following the close of the application period, the Department of Economic Development will review applications to ensure that all submission requirements have been met. Applications deemed incomplete will not be scored.
The Vibrancy Incentive Committee (VIC) will review and score eligible applications based on the evaluation criteria outlined below. Upon completion of its review, the VIC will forward its scoring results and funding recommendations to the Mayor, who retains full discretion in determining final awards.
Proposed projects are scored using a 100-point system that is scored on the following criteria:
Evaluation Criteria | Scoring | Weight | Max Score |
| Project Impact The proposed improvements meaningfully enhance the building and surrounding area by activating the space, strengthening the commercial corridor, improving safety and accessibility, encouraging foot traffic, and supporting additional private investment. | 0-10 | X4 | 40 |
| Legacy Commercial Corridor This criterion evaluates whether a project is located within a designated Legacy Commercial Corridor. Projects located in a Legacy Commercial Corridor receive (5) points, reflecting their cultural and historical significance and their role in strengthening the economic vitality of the neighborhood. | 0/5 | X4 | 20 |
| Historic & Design Preservation The project respects and enhances the building’s historic, architectural, or neighborhood character. Consideration is given to the age of the building as well as whether the proposed improvements preserve, restore, or thoughtfully incorporate original or defining design features. | 0-5 | X3 | 15 |
| Neighborhood Revitalization Strategic Areas This criterion evaluates whether a project is located within a designated Neighborhood Revitalization Strategic Area (NRSA). Projects located in a NRSA receive (5) points, reflecting a coordinated effort to prioritize place-based revitalization and maximize impact in strategic neighborhoods. | 0/5 | X2 | 10 |
| Project Readiness & Feasibility The project is realistic, well-planned, and ready to move forward. Costs are reasonable for the proposed work, bids reflect typical local pricing, matching funds are secured, and the applicant demonstrates the ability to manage and complete the project without significant related obstacles. | 0-5 | X2 | 10 |
| Walkability Score This criterion evaluates whether a project is located within a designated Walkable Oriented Development (WOD) cluster. These clusters, identified in the Forward Toledo Plan, are locations where walkable, mixed-use activity is intentionally concentrated. Projects in WOD clusters receive (5) points, reflecting the project’s potential to contribute to and build upon existing clustered activity. | 0/5 | X1 | 5 |
Maximum Possible Score: | 100 | ||
| Prior Planning Grant Recipient - Bonus Points Applicants that previously received a Façade Improvement Planning Grant will receive (10) bonus points, and the potential of a maximum possible score of 110. | +10 | +10 |